Back to Blog
Infrastructure
19 min read

Scaling Email Infrastructure: From Thousands to Millions of Emails

Design and operate email systems that handle massive volume without breaking

GetMailer Team

GetMailer Team

Author

Scaling Email Infrastructure: From Thousands to Millions of Emails
Photo by Stephen Dawson on Unsplash

Sending a hundred emails is easy. Sending a million emails reliably, quickly, and without getting blocked requires thoughtful architecture. Email infrastructure that works at small scale often breaks dramatically as volume increases.

This guide covers the challenges of email at scale and the patterns that successful high-volume senders use.

Scaling Challenges

Throughput

More emails mean more processing. Synchronous sending that works fine at low volume becomes a bottleneck. Database operations, template rendering, and API calls all need to handle increased load.

Deliverability at Scale

ISPs scrutinize high-volume senders more closely. Reputation issues that were invisible at low volume suddenly cause blocking. You cannot just send faster - you need to send smarter.

Reliability

With higher volume comes higher stakes. A bug that drops 1% of emails is 10 lost emails at 1,000 sends but 10,000 lost emails at a million sends. Systems must be more robust.

Cost

Email costs scale with volume. Inefficient sending, excessive retries, and poor list hygiene become expensive at scale. Optimization matters.

Architecture Patterns

Asynchronous Processing

Never send emails synchronously in request handlers. Use message queues to decouple email sending from user requests. This provides fast user responses, graceful handling of spikes, retry capability, and better monitoring and debugging.

Queue Design

  • Priority queues: Password resets before newsletters
  • Rate limiting: Respect ISP and API limits
  • Dead letter queues: Handle failed sends
  • Idempotency: Prevent duplicate sends

Horizontal Scaling

Scale out rather than up. Run multiple worker instances processing from the same queue. Add workers during peak times. Use auto-scaling based on queue depth.

Database Considerations

  • Index frequently queried fields (email addresses, send status)
  • Partition large tables by date or tenant
  • Archive old data regularly
  • Use read replicas for reporting queries
  • Consider event sourcing for send history

IP and Domain Strategy

IP Pool Management

At high volume, single IPs hit rate limits. Use multiple IPs with intelligent routing based on ISP-specific rate limits, reputation per IP, message priority, and domain separation.

Subdomain Strategy

Separate email types using subdomains. Use transactional.example.com for transactional email, marketing.example.com for marketing, and notifications.example.com for notifications. This isolates reputation issues and allows different authentication policies.

Warmup at Scale

New IPs need careful warmup:

  1. Start with your most engaged recipients
  2. Increase volume gradually (double every few days)
  3. Monitor reputation closely during warmup
  4. Back off if issues arise
  5. Full warmup takes 4-6 weeks for large volumes

Rate Limiting and Throttling

ISP Rate Limits

Major ISPs limit incoming mail per IP. Gmail and Outlook have undisclosed limits that vary by reputation. Yahoo is more explicit. Smaller ISPs may have tight limits. Implement per-ISP throttling based on feedback.

Adaptive Throttling

Adjust sending rate based on ISP feedback. When you see 4xx responses (temporary rejection), slow down. When you see 5xx responses (permanent rejection), stop and investigate. Use feedback loops to auto-adjust rates.

Time-Based Distribution

Spread sends over time rather than blasting all at once. This avoids overwhelming ISPs, provides natural throttling, allows monitoring during the send, and enables stopping if problems arise.

Monitoring at Scale

Key Metrics

  • Queue depth: Are we keeping up with volume?
  • Processing latency: How long from queue to send?
  • Error rates: What percentage are failing?
  • ISP-specific delivery: Problems with specific providers?
  • Cost per email: Are we efficient?

Alerting

  • Queue growing faster than processing
  • Error rate exceeding threshold
  • Delivery rate dropping
  • Specific ISP blocking
  • Worker failures or restarts

Observability

At scale, you need to trace specific emails through your system. Implement correlation IDs on every email, structured logging with searchable fields, distributed tracing for complex flows, and dashboards for real-time visibility.

Cost Optimization

List Hygiene

Every bounced email costs money. Every email to an unengaged user costs money. Maintain clean lists to reduce waste.

Efficient Processing

Optimize template rendering, batch database operations, use connection pooling, and cache frequently accessed data.

Smart Retries

Not all failures should retry. Hard bounces should never retry. Implement exponential backoff and cap retry attempts to avoid wasting resources on undeliverable emails.

Provider Selection

At high volume, per-email pricing matters. Compare providers based on actual sending patterns. Consider volume discounts, and factor in the cost of reputation damage from poor deliverability.

Conclusion

Scaling email infrastructure requires intentional design. The patterns that work at low volume often fail at scale. Invest in asynchronous processing, proper queue management, monitoring, and ISP relationship management.

The reward for getting it right is reliable email delivery that scales with your business without manual intervention or constant firefighting.

GetMailer is built for scale. Our infrastructure handles millions of emails daily with automatic throttling, IP pool management, and enterprise-grade reliability. Focus on your product while we handle the email delivery complexity.

ScalingTransactional EmailEmail Infrastructure

Ready to improve your email?

Start sending beautiful, reliable emails with GetMailer.

Get Started Free